Leave a Message

Thank you for your message. I will be in touch with you shortly.

Explore My Properties

Transaction Capabilities

DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS & COMPARATIVE MARKET ANALYSIS

THREE PATHS TO VALUE

1615 EL DORADO AVENUE

SANTA CRUZ, CA 95062

APN 026-181-23  ·  24,699 SF / 0.567 ACRES  ·  ZONED R-1-4-L

PATH ONE

Developer

Retain the landmark, build in the rear

PATH TWO

Owner-User

Live in one, add an ADU, rent the rest

PATH THREE

Hybrid

Occupy, remodel, add density over time

THE CENTRAL QUESTION

Three record sources describe this parcel three different ways — two houses, three units, or commercial multifamily. The historic overlay on the front house and an apparent riparian corridor at the rear then narrow what can actually be built. This analysis reconciles the record, establishes what the site will realistically support, and prices it against five recent land trades.

TROY HINDS

831.706.6224

REALTOR® | DRE 01803325
[email protected]
COLLECTIVEREALESTATE.COM

PREPARED SEPTEMBER 22, 2026

1. PROPERTY OVERVIEW

1615 EL DORADO AVENUE

SITE & RECORD

SITE

APN026-181-23
Lot size24,699 SF · 0.567 ac
ZoningR-1-4-L
TopographyLevel
Water / sewerPublic / public
Flood zoneX (unshaded)
Building qualityBelow average (C)

OWNERSHIP & TAX

VestingLife estate — terminated
SellerBeneficiaries · as-is, cash-out
Last transferMarch 1966 · $6,000
Land value (2025 roll)$479,436
Improvement value$256,137
Total assessed$735,573
Annual tax$10,052.40
> IMPROVEMENTS OF RECORD

Structure

Built

Area

Bd/Ba

Status

Main house (front)

1890

1,708 SF

3 / 2

Designated historic

Cottage

1890

452 SF

1 / 1

Second legal dwelling

Rear structure

1960

576 SF

0 / 0

Zero units on roll — verify

Carport

—

648 SF

—

Conversion candidate

UNIT COUNT — THE RECORD DISAGREES

COUNTY ASSESSOR

2 SFRs / 1 APN

Use class 031

RPR

3 units

Multifamily / multiplex

FIRST AMERICAN

Multifamily, ≤10

Use code only

The three reconcile once the 1960 rear structure is isolated. The Assessor carries it at zero units, zero bedrooms and zero baths — but with a fireplace and wall heat, which is how an unpermitted conversion typically appears on the roll. Two legal dwellings is the defensible position; the third is a permit-history question, not a record question. Pull the permit file before pricing. The answer moves financing, rentable income and the buyer pool.

2. DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS

WHAT THE SITE WILL BEAR

ZONING & OVERLAYS

BASE ZONING

R-1-4

Single-family residential, 4,000 SF minimum site area

COMBINING DISTRICT

—L Landmark

Historic designation on the 1890 front house

> CONSTRAINTS THAT BIND

Constraint

Effect on Yield

Historic landmark

Demolition of the front house is effectively off the table. Exterior alterations go to design review. The practical consequence: any added density has to happen behind the landmark, not in place of it.

SB 9 lot split

State law excludes parcels designated as a historic landmark or within a historic district. Assume SB 9 is unavailable here and confirm with Planning — this removes the simplest path to four units.

SB 684 / SB 1123

SB 1123's single-family pathway requires a vacant parcel. This one is improved and occupied, so that route likely fails on its face. SB 684 turns on the site's multifamily status — which is exactly the unit-count question from page 2.

Riparian corridor

A setback appears along the rear property line. County riparian setbacks run roughly 30 to 50 feet from top of bank depending on classification. On a parcel this shape that plausibly sterilizes [X] SF of the rear yard — the exact area a rear-build scheme depends on. Survey and County confirmation required.

ADU / JADU

State ADU law still applies over a landmark designation, though design review attaches. The 648 SF carport and the 576 SF rear structure are both conversion candidates. This is the lowest-friction way to add doors here.

> YIELD, THEORY VERSUS PRACTICE

Pathway

Units

Assessment

Raw R-1-4 density (24,699 ÷ 4,000)

6

Theoretical only — requires clearing the site

SB 9 urban lot split

—

Likely barred by landmark status

Existing + ADU + JADU

4–5

Most reliable; no discretionary approval needed

Density bonus / Builder's Remedy

6–8

Precedent exists locally — see 841 Capitola Rd

One upside worth raising with a buyer: a landmark designation opens a Mills Act contract, which can cut the property tax burden substantially in exchange for a maintenance and preservation commitment. On a parcel currently carrying $10,052 a year against a 1966 basis — a figure that resets on sale — that is a real offset to the restrictions and it favors the owner-user.

3. BUYER PROFILES

WHO BUYS THIS, AND WHY

THREE PATHS

Each path below has already traded in this market within the last cycle. The comparable named in each column is not an abstraction — it is a buyer who paid for this exact problem and executed a specific plan on it.

PATH ONE

Developer

Retain and repair the landmark, then build apartments in the rear yard.

PRECEDENT

21231 E Cliff Dr

$1,208,000

Sold with the historic building and potential for 6 rear apartments, now under construction.

WHAT IT TAKES

Density bonus or Builder's Remedy entitlement · design review on the landmark · riparian setback survey · 12–18 month approval horizon · construction financing

PRESSURE POINT

Rear-yard buildable area after the riparian setback. This path lives or dies on that survey.

PAYS MOST FOR: Confirmed buildable rear area and a clear entitlement path

PATH TWO

Owner-User

Occupy the main house, add an ADU, hold the cottage as income.

PRECEDENT

1430 Merrill St

$1,545,000

Added an ADU tiny home, rented one unit, rebuilt one as a new SFR.

WHAT IT TAKES

Ministerial ADU permit · residential financing on an owner-occupied basis · no discretionary approval · 6–9 months to added income

PRESSURE POINT

Condition. An 1890 structure at below-average quality carries real deferred maintenance.

PAYS MOST FOR: Character, lot size, and a Mills Act tax contract

PATH THREE

Hybrid

Occupy one, remodel the others, add density in phases as capital allows.

PRECEDENT

1211 Webster St

$1,345,393

Rebuilt the SFR, remodeled the duplex, added an ADU.

WHAT IT TAKES

Staged capital · owner-occupancy during works · permits taken one at a time · tolerance for a multi-year hold

PRESSURE POINT

The legal status of the 1960 rear structure — it either becomes an asset or a correction order.

PAYS MOST FOR: Optionality — no single approval has to land

WHERE THE BID IS LIKELY TO COME FROM

The landmark overlay cuts against the pure developer and toward the other two. A developer prices the restriction as risk and discounts for it; an owner-user and a hybrid buyer price the same restriction as character, and the Mills Act turns part of it into a benefit they can actually bank. Expect the strongest number from Path Two or Three unless the riparian survey comes back generous enough to make a rear-yard scheme pencil.

4. COMPARATIVE MARKET ANALYSIS

SALES COMPARABLES

RANKED BY RELEVANCE

Listed in order of weight rather than price. No single comparable matches the subject on every axis, so each is ranked by the axis it actually controls for — designation, physical profile, location, condition, or terms.

#

Address

Sale Price

Lot SF

$/Land SF

Controls For

1

21231 E Cliff Dr

$1,208,000

12,676

$95.30

Historic designation

2

1430 Merrill St

$1,545,000

19,500

$79.23

Lot, structures, age

3

841 Capitola Rd

$1,650,000

38,943

$42.37

Proximity

4

1211 Webster St

$1,345,393

20,081

$67.00

As-is condition

5

1526 7th Ave

$1,687,000

23,217

$72.66

Overall balance — terms-inflated

—

1615 EL DORADO AVE

Subject

24,699

—

Landmark-constrained

> WEIGHTING & TRANSACTION NOTES
21231 E Cliff DrPrimary comparable
Identical historic designation and a similar site layout, which is why it carries the most weight despite different zoning. Sold with the existing historic building and development potential for 6 apartments in the rear, which the developer buyer is now building — the exact playbook available here.
1430 Merrill St
Closest match on lot size, structure count, and age and condition. Owner-user added an ADU tiny home, rented one unit to a friend, rebuilt one as a new SFR. Traded at $1,545,000 against a $1,975,000 ask.
841 Capitola Rd
Closest in proximity. Developer pursuing affordable housing via density bonus and Builder's Remedy — confirming that pathway is live in this submarket. Substantially larger site, and the lowest land PSF in the set.
1211 Webster St
A similar property but premium in as-is structure quality, so it marks a ceiling the subject will not reach without work. Hybrid buyer rebuilt the SFR, remodeled the duplex, added an ADU.
1526 7th Ave
Similar on the overall balance of size, style, condition and proximity — but it commanded a significant premium for long-term seller financing at a low down payment. Five years amortized at 6%. Adjust downward for terms before using it.
On land PSF the primary comparable is the most expensive in the set at $95.30 — nearly double the subject's implied rate. That is a lot-size and zoning effect, not a designation premium: E Cliff sold with the historic building plus potential for six apartments on half the land, now under construction. Priced per potential door instead — $1,208,000 across 7 doors, or $172,571 each — it becomes the lens that translates to the subject. Seller financing at 1526 7th Ave cuts the other way, lifting a comparable property well above where a cash or conventional buyer landed.

4. COMPARATIVE MARKET ANALYSIS

SALES COMPARABLES

RANKED BY RELEVANCE

Listed in order of weight rather than price. No single comparable matches the subject on every axis, so each is ranked by the axis it actually controls for — designation, physical profile, location, condition, or terms.

#

Address

Sale Price

Lot SF

$/Land SF

Controls For

1

21231 E Cliff Dr

$1,208,000

[ ]

[ ]

Historic designation

2

1430 Merrill St

$1,545,000

19,500

$79

Lot, structures, age

3

841 Capitola Rd

$1,650,000

38,943

$42

Proximity

4

1211 Webster St

$1,345,393

[ ]

[ ]

As-is condition

5

1526 7th Ave

$1,687,000

[ ]

[ ]

Overall balance — terms-inflated

—

1615 EL DORADO AVE

Subject

24,699

—

Landmark-constrained

> WEIGHTING & TRANSACTION NOTES
21231 E Cliff DrPrimary comparable
Identical historic designation and a similar site layout, which is why it carries the most weight despite different zoning. Developer buyer retained and repaired the historic building and developed 6 apartments to the rear — the exact playbook available here.
1430 Merrill St
Closest match on lot size, structure count, and age and condition. Owner-user added an ADU tiny home, rented one unit to a friend, rebuilt one as a new SFR. Traded at $1,545,000 against a $1,975,000 ask.
841 Capitola Rd
Closest in proximity. Developer pursuing affordable housing via density bonus and Builder's Remedy — confirming that pathway is live in this submarket. Substantially larger site, and the lowest land PSF in the set.
1211 Webster St
A similar property but premium in as-is structure quality, so it marks a ceiling the subject will not reach without work. Hybrid buyer rebuilt the SFR, remodeled the duplex, added an ADU.
1526 7th Ave
Similar on the overall balance of size, style, condition and proximity — but it commanded a significant premium for long-term seller financing at a low down payment. Five years amortized at 6%. Adjust downward for terms before using it.
The primary comparable is also the cheapest in the set. That is the finding, not a coincidence: a historic designation on the principal structure trades at a discount to otherwise similar sites, and 21231 E Cliff is the only sale here that prices that discount directly. Seller financing at 1526 7th Ave cuts the other way, lifting a comparable property well above where a cash or conventional buyer landed.

5. CONCLUSION

VALUATION & NEXT STEPS

PRELIMINARY

RPR AVM

$1,234,000

$1.02M – $1.44M

COMP RANGE

$1.21 – 1.69M

Five trades

95062 MEDIAN

$1,700,000

Multifamily, Aug 2026

LOT SIZE

24,699 SF

0.567 acres

Method

Indication

Basis

Size-adjusted land

$1,676,000

Five-comp trend: $67.87/SF at 24,699 SF, unrestricted

Automated valuation

$1,234,000

RPR, 9/12/2026 — blind to the overlay and the lot

Per door, primary comp

$1.21 – 1.38M

E Cliff $172,571 per door × 7–8 doors

Midrange check

$1,345,393

1211 Webster — within $4,607 of the midpoint

Upper bracket

$1,425,000

Merrill less 7.8% · equals 8.3 doors at E Cliff's rate

PRELIMINARY INDICATED VALUE

$1,275,000 – $1,425,000

Midpoint $1,350,000  ·  Land PSF $51.62 – $57.69

RECOMMENDED LIST PRICE

$1,349,000

$54.62 per land SF

Land price per foot falls as lots get larger; across all five comps the trend at 24,699 SF is $67.87, or $1,676,000 for an unrestricted site. The range sits below that for the landmark, condition and riparian setback, and equals 7.4 to 8.3 doors at E Cliff's $172,571 per door — a price that works for a buyer who can reach seven or eight doors.

Why $1,349,000. It sits at the midpoint and just under the $1,350,000 search break, so it surfaces for every buyer filtering at that ceiling. It lists $3,607 over Webster's sale, offset by 4,618 SF more land. At the 95062 multifamily sold-to-list ratio of 95.6% it nets about $1,290,000 — still above the floor — leaving $74,000 of room for as-is and riparian concessions. With no seller-funded survey, first offers will come in near the floor; this list price keeps that negotiation inside the range.
> PATH TO CLOSE — AS-IS, ALL CASH-OUT
1Pull the permit fileSettles 2 units versus 3 — a records request, no costListing agent
2Confirm the landmark listingWhich register, what it restricts, Mills Act eligibilityListing agent
3Survey the riparian setbackRear buildable area the developer bid depends onBuyer DD
4Pre-application meetingCounty position on SB 9, ADU count, rear densityBuyer DD

CONFIDENTIAL OFFERING MEMORANDUM · COMMERCIAL | MULTIFAMILY | DEVELOPMENT

251 High Street, Santa Cruz

Offered at $6,750,000

  • 8.7% average annual rental rate growth (2015–2022)
  • 0.0% vacancy rate (except when units are offline for renovation)
  • Constructed as condos, preliminary condo map, individually metered — always operated as multifamily
  • First time on the market, original owner

UNITS

10

PRICE/UNIT

$675,000

CAP RATE (CURRENT)

3.56%

CAP RATE (STABILIZED)

4.08%

> INVESTMENT OVERVIEW

Unit Mix

4 – 2BR/1BA · 6 – 1BR/1BA

Price / SF

$1,238

GRM (Current / Stabilized)

19.89 / 17.96

Year Built

2006

Gross Building / Land Area

5,454 SF / 12,240 SF

Parking

11 covered · 6 uncovered

> PROFORMA — CURRENT VS. MARKET/TURNOVER

Current

Market/Turnover

Gross Scheduled Income

$339,385

$375,800

Total Expenses

$97,698 (28.9%)

$98,785 (26.4%)

Net Operating Income

$239,990

$275,136

Improvements track record: 95% of windows replaced (last 7 yrs), 70% new appliances, 60% new flooring, 3 of 10 units fully remodeled, all new water heaters ($10,217), 5-year fire sprinkler upgrade ($5,000), exterior repaint scheduled 2022 ($31,000). Rent roll shows 8.7% average annual growth 2015–2022, accelerating to 9.9–13.3% YoY in 2022.
> SALE COMPARABLES
2230 Alice St, Santa CruzSold $2,180,000 · $641/SF · Zoning RM-4
151 Brennan St, WatsonvilleActive $4,995,000 · $320/SF · Zoning RM-3
120-124 Hiawatha AveCanceled $6,250,000 · $665/SF · Zoning R3

CONFIDENTIAL OFFERING MEMORANDUM · 3 HOMES | RM-2.5 DEVELOPMENT LOT

1430 Merrill Street, Santa Cruz

Offered at $1,975,000

LOT SIZE

19,500 SF

ZONING

RM-2.5

DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL

19 Units

PRICE/SF (LAND)

~$100

> TWO DEVELOPMENT PATHS

Recommended: Multifamily (19 units)

Total Development Cost$9,745,000
Annual NOI$605,366
Market Value @ 4.00% cap$15,134,150
Cash-on-Cash Return6.21%
Estimated Equity Gain$5,389,150

Alternative: SFR (6 luxury homes)

Total Development Cost$6,300,000
Projected Sales Revenue$12.6M – $14.4M
Gross Profit$6.3M – $8.1M
Profit Margin100% – 129%

Why this opportunity: largest RM-2.5 parcel available in 50+ years, walkable Live Oak coastal location (6 min to Black's Beach, 3 min to the farmers market), clean title with no rental history, level rectangular lot, all utilities available.

  • Current improvements: three residential structures in disrepair, no rental history (primary residence)
  • SB 684/1123 eligible for single-family conversion
  • Target close: Nov 15 – Dec 1, 2025
> DEVELOPMENT SITE COMPARABLES
3811 Portola DrList $3,995,000 · $120/SF · Zoning C-2 · 40+ unit mixed-use potential
2378 Harper St, Live OakSold $2,500,000 (8/19/24) · $35/SF · Zoning R-1-6-D
1940 Kinsley St, Live OakList $2,000,000 · $50/SF · Zoning RM-4-L · 3 homes + workshop

ACQUISITION COMPARISON · VALUE-ADD MULTIFAMILY

234 High Street vs. 140 Bay Street

Santa Cruz, CA — Westside · Both Listed at $3,200,000 · 10 Units vs. 8 Units

234 HIGH STREET

$1,364,672

Value created at a 5% cap · 10 units, 1944, master metered

140 BAY STREET

$262,921

Value created at a 5% cap · 8 units, tenants pay gas/electric

The central question. Two Westside buildings, the same $3.2M ask, and going-in cap rates within a quarter point of each other — 3.98% against 3.75%. On the surface they are the same trade. They are not. One carries a $39,500 master-metered utility bill and nine of ten units below market; the other is already clean, already sub-metered, and already close to its ceiling. This analysis prices the difference between a fixable problem and a finished building.
1. SIDE BY SIDE — PROPERTY & PERFORMANCE
234 High StreetWestside · 10 Units · 1944
140 Bay StreetWestside · 8 Units · Older

List Price

$3,200,000

$3,200,000

Units

10

8

Price per Unit

$320,000

$400,000

Average Unit Size

630 SF

Not available

Year Built

1944

Older (vintage)

Unit Mix

1 Std · 8 1BR · 1 2BR

8 mixed

Utilities

Master metered (LL pays)

Tenant pays gas/elec

Subsidized Tenants

None

2 of 8 (HUD/Section 8)

Currently Occupied

10 / 10

8 / 8

GOING-IN PERFORMANCE — BOTH NORMALIZED TO $3.2M

Annual Gross Rent

$252,036

$208,952

Vacancy (3%)

($7,561)

($6,269)

Effective Gross Income

$244,475

$202,684

Total Operating Expenses

($117,163)

($82,577)

Expense Ratio

47.9%

40.7%

Net Operating Income

$127,311

$120,107

Going-In Cap Rate

3.98%

3.75%

STABILIZED / VALUE-ADD PERFORMANCE

OPERATING HISTORY & PRO-FORMA PROJECTIONS

Three Years of Cash Flow

140 Bay Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 — 140 Belly, LLC · 8 Units · Westside · 2 of 8 HUD/Section 8

2025 ACTUAL

$128,980

True NOI · 64.3% margin

2026 PROJECTED

$130,802

Post-management switch

2027 PROJECTED

$145,926

After 7.7% rent increase

What this package shows. 2025 actuals restated to separate recurring operations from capital projects, then carried forward two years. The property earned $128,980 of true NOI on $200,475 of effective gross income — a 64.3% margin — but spent $109,099 on capital work in the same year, leaving $19,881 of reported net income. The projections hold that operating base flat, add the management-company switch, and apply the AB 1482 rent ceiling.
1. THREE-YEAR OPERATING SUMMARY — 2025A–2027P

Line Item

2025 Actual

2026 Proj.

2027 Proj.

Gross / Market Rent

$162,220

$165,968

$178,748

Subsidized Rent (HUD / Section 8)

$42,599

$42,984

$46,294

Abated Rent

($4,345)

—

—

Other Income — PM-Switch Savings

—

$5,628

$4,716

Effective Gross Income

$200,475

$214,580

$229,757

Total Operating Expenses

($71,495)

($83,779)

($83,832)

Expense Ratio

35.7%

39.0%

36.5%

Net Operating Income

$128,980

$130,802

$145,926

NOI Margin

64.3%

61.0%

63.5%

NOI Growth vs Prior Year

—

+$1,822 · +1.4%

+$15,124 · +11.6%

Capital Expenditures

($109,099)

Not modeled

Not modeled

Net Income After CapEx

$19,881

—

—

Offering Memorandum | Confidential

Exclusive Investment Opportunity — Santa Cruz, CA

OHANA HALE RESIDENCES

247 High Street | Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Asking Price

$1,895,000

Units / Beds

7 Units | 27 Beds (Min.)

Stabilized NOI

$378,659

UCSC Proximity

~1 Mile

Gross Building Area

5,858 SF

Blended Rent

$1,800 / Bed / Mo

Cap Rate

5.00%

Const. Timeline

~12 Months

INSTITUTIONAL INSPIRED STUDENT HOUSING · FULLY PERMITTED · SHOVEL-READY · FULLY FURNISHED

Purpose Design/Built for Shared Rooms · Queen Loft Beds w/Desks · Leased Per-Bed · UCSC & Downtown Santa Cruz Proximate

TROY HINDS

831.706.6224 | REALTOR® | DRE 01803325 | [email protected]

8x President's Club Elite | 2023 #1 Top Individual Agent | David Lyng Real Estate

Feasibility Analysis | Market Positioning

247 High Street | Santa Cruz, CA 95060 | Ohana Hale Residences

Prepared April 24, 2026 | Supplemental to Developer Pro Forma | Confidential

DISCLAIMER

This analysis provides market positioning and financial feasibility projections for Ohana Hale Residences, a brand-new 7-unit, 27-bed purpose-built student housing development at 247 High Street, Santa Cruz, California. Findings are intended to supplement the developer pro forma and should be read alongside third-party appraisal documentation. All projections are estimates subject to change.

1. Projected Rental Rates (2026–2027 Academic Year)

For a brand-new, all-inclusive student housing project like Ohana Hale Residences, rental rates are positioned at the top of the Santa Cruz market. By including utilities, furniture, and high-speed Wi-Fi in the per-bed rate, the project offers a level of convenience that justifies a meaningful premium over traditional apartments.

Room Type

Projected Rate / Mo

Includes

Single Bedroom (1 per unit)

$2,400 – $2,550

Private room, queen loft/desk setup, all utilities, furnished common areas

Double Bedroom (4 per unit)

$1,750 – $1,850 / bed

Shared room, individual loft/desk, IKEA wardrobe, all utilities, furnished common areas

Blended Per-Bed Average

$1,800

Gross Rental Income: $610,524 / year

2. Market Comparison — Ohana Hale vs. The Competition

Ohana Hale occupies a unique niche between high-density institutional dorms and luxury downtown mid-rises, offering boutique finishes at student-accessible price points with unmatched proximity to campus.

Development

Type

Std. Double (All-In)

Std. Single (All-In)

Key Difference

Ohana Hale

Boutique Infill / New/Luxury Student

$1,700

$2,200

Closest to campus; boutique feel; brand new; lowest ascent to campus (Hilltop further downhill)

Hilltop Apartments

Student Specific

$1,899

N/A

Older units; utilities often extra; has pool/gym

Delaware Addition

Student Specific

$2,094

$2,381

Institutional; high-density; official UCSC partner

UCSC Dorms/Apts

On-Campus

$1,903–$1,993

$2,268

Basic amenities; shared communal bathrooms

*Hilltop often requires tenants to pay additional utilities, keeping the effective all-in cost comparable to Ohana Hale.

Development Feasibility Analysis | Confidential

3811 Portola Drive

Santa Cruz, California 95062 | APN: 032-051-22 · 0.495 Acres · Zoning: C-2 Community Commercial · Pleasure Point Commercial Corridor

Parcel Size

21,562 SF / 0.495 Acres

Zoning

C-2 Community Commercial

Base Density

22 Units (45/acre)

Realistic Max

14–16 Units

Viable Height

2 Stories Only

Max Parking

40 Spaces (Podium)

Commercial Req.

7,200 SF (80/20 Rule)

40+ Unit Claim

Not Feasible

Key Finding

The 40+ unit claim is NOT FEASIBLE. Two development scenarios demonstrate the constraints:

Option 1 — Theoretical Maximum (Ignoring Parking): 28 units. Base density (22) + 20% density bonus + 6 ADU conversions. Assumes unlimited parking. Not realistic.

Option 2 — Parking-Constrained Reality: 14–16 units. The 80/20 commercial requirement forces 7,200 SF of commercial space requiring 24 parking spaces. Ground floor podium maximum: 40 spaces. Residential spaces remaining: 16 = 14–16 units maximum. Realistic maximum.

The 40+ unit claim represents a 60–175% overstatement. Parking is the true binding constraint.

Property Comparison

3811 Portola Drive vs. 21245 E Cliff Drive

Metric

3811 Portola Drive

21245 E Cliff Drive

Parcel Size

21,562 SF (+40%)

15,430 SF

Base Density (45/acre)

22 units

16 units

Viable Height

2 stories*

3 stories

Option 1: Theoretical Max

28 units (22 + 6 ADU)

20 units (16 + 4 ADU)

Option 2: Parking-Constrained

14–16 units

20 units

*3 stories technically permitted per SCCC 13.10.334(D) but economically infeasible: stepback requirements limit third floor to ~7,000 SF while triggering +$55–95/SF construction cost premium across the entire building.

Zoning Analysis

Zoning & Density Analysis

Comparative Market Analysis | Confidential | May 21, 2026

3811 Portola Drive

Santa Cruz, California 95062 | APN: 032-051-33

21,562 SF | C-2 Zoning | 1.5 FAR | Pleasure Point Commercial Corridor

Asking Price

$3,500,000

Asking Price PSF

$162.32 / SF

Best Comp PSF (3501 Portola)

$91.34 / SF — In Contract

Comp-Indicated Value

$1,969,000 – $2,534,000

Price Premium to Best Comp

+78% Above Market

Comp Avg PSF (8 Sales)

$117.56 / SF

Own Analysis FMV

$2,534,812

Price Gap (vs. FMV)

$965,000 – $1,531,000

Bottom Line

The $3,500,000 asking price for 3811 Portola Drive represents $162.32/SF — a 78% premium over the most comparable and current transaction in this market: 3501 Portola Drive, currently in contract at $91.34/SF.

Applying the full range of 8 C-2 sales comps from this corridor produces an indicated value range of $1,969,000 to $2,534,000. The seller's own development land residual analysis confirms market value at approximately $2,534,812 — more than $965,000 below the asking price.

From a developer's underwriting standpoint, $3,500,000 for land that supports only 14–16 realistic units (as established in the accompanying feasibility analysis) produces a deeply negative return before a single dollar of construction is spent.

TROY HINDS

831.706.6224 | REALTOR® | DRE 01803325 | [email protected]

Collective Real Estate at David Lyng Real Estate | 8x President's Club Elite | 2023 #1 Top Individual Agent

Disclosure Review Summary | Prepared for: Joseph | Confidential

2974 E. Cliff Drive

Santa Cruz, California 95062 | Live Oak

Multi-Story Coastal Home | ~4,317 SF | ~7 Years Old | Inspection: February 2025

Home Size

~4,317 SF

Age

~7 Years (Built ~2018)

Structural

No Major Defects

Pest Inspection

No Active Infestation

Sewer Lateral

Passed

Safety Items

4 Items — Action Required

Water / Moisture

5 Flags — Evaluate Further

Not Inspected

6 Systems — Gaps Remain

Executive Summary

Relatively new multi-story coastal home with no major structural defects, no active pest infestation, and a passing sewer lateral inspection.

The biggest items to address are several safety and electrical concerns — missing CO alarms, an improperly wired sub panel in a basement bathroom, and a loose toilet — along with moisture and water-intrusion red flags including cracked stucco, earth-to-stucco contact, suspicious cladding behind a railing post with visible moisture, and an unidentified taped stucco penetration.

None of these items are deal-breakers on their own, but the water intrusion flags warrant further investigation by a qualified contractor before closing.

TROY HINDS

831.706.6224 | REALTOR® | DRE 01803325 | [email protected]

Collective Real Estate at David Lyng Real Estate | 8x President's Club Elite | 2023 #1 Top Individual Agent

Developer Pro Forma | Confidential

3811 Portola Drive

Santa Cruz, California 95062 | APN: 032-051-33

21,562 SF Lot | C-2 Zoning | 1.5 FAR | Mixed-Use: 12 Residential Units + 2,366 SF NNN Commercial

Land Acquisition

$2,750,000

Total Project Cost

$9,063,000

Residential Units

4 × 1BR | 4 × Sm 2BR | 4 × Lg 2BR

Commercial (NNN)

2,366 SF @ $5.00/SF/Mo

Total Gross Revenue

$821,880 / Year

Net Operating Income

$609,227 / Year

Stabilized Value (5% Cap)

$12,184,541

Developer Profit (5% Cap)

$3,121,541

Project Overview

Mixed-use redevelopment of 3811 Portola Drive in the Pleasure Point Commercial Corridor, three blocks from The Hook. The project remodels and leases the existing 2,366 SF medical/commercial building under a Triple Net (NNN) lease at $5.00/SF/month, while constructing 12 new market-rate residential apartments averaging 800 SF at $500/SF.

Land is acquired at $2,750,000 with $250,000 in pre-construction soft costs and entitlements funded by the owner prior to a construction loan. The NNN commercial component significantly reduces landlord operating expense obligations, enhancing the overall income profile.

At a blended residential rate of $4,722/month (4 × 1BR @ $4,325 / 4 × Sm 2BR @ $4,695 / 4 × Lg 2BR @ $5,145), the project produces strong developer returns across every realistic cap rate scenario. At $2.75M land and a 5.0% cap rate, developer profit exceeds $3.19M. Even at the full $3.5M asking price, the deal remains profitable above $2.44M at 5.0% cap — though the CMA-supported value range of $1.97M–$2.53M still represents the appropriate acquisition basis.

TROY HINDS

831.706.6224 | REALTOR® | DRE 01803325 | [email protected]

Collective Real Estate at David Lyng Real Estate | 8x President's Club Elite | 2023 #1 Top Individual Agent

Off-Market Property Summary | David Lyng Exclusive

4120 Court Drive, Santa Cruz, CA 95062

Pleasure Point | 3 BD / 2 BA | ±1,636 SF | David Lyng Exclusive

Bottom Line

Pre-market opportunity on one of the best streets in Pleasure Point, two blocks from The Hook and walking distance to 41st Ave and Capitola Village. Single-level coastal home with vaulted ceilings, updated kitchen with Viking range, and a fully built-out backyard entertainment setup.

Offered at $3,600,000 during a private David Lyng Exclusive window before public launch. The seller is completing cosmetic updates (paint, countertops, carpet) in the second half of May, with a target market date by month's end.

Property Summary

CategoryDetails
Address4120 Court Drive, Santa Cruz, CA 95062
NeighborhoodPleasure Point (Court Dr)
Off-Market Price$3,600,000
Living Area±1,636 SF / ±1,915 SF incl. garage
Bonus Space±240 SF converted patio (non-permitted)
Bedrooms / Baths3 BD / 2 BA
LayoutSingle level
Garage1-car + extra-large locked storage
ParkingElectric gate, driveway 2–3 cars
StatusDavid Lyng Exclusive — Off-Market

Interior Features

Kitchen & Living

  • Vaulted ceilings with abundant natural light and skylights
  • Updated kitchen with stainless appliances and Viking range
  • Extensive built-in shelving and cabinetry throughout
  • Separate den with entertainment center, bar, and French doors
  • 24-speaker whole-home sound system

Primary Suite

  • Private and spacious with direct access
  • Large walk-in closet with custom built-in organizers

Outdoor Living

  • Built-in BBQ station
  • Outdoor TV
  • Fire pit
  • Hot tub
  • Well-manicured front yard with electric entry gate
  • Paved driveway parking for 2–3 vehicles

Upcoming Seller Updates

UpdateScope
PaintFull interior and exterior repaint
CabinetsCabinet refresh / refinish
CountertopsKitchen, bar, and primary bath
CarpetBack bedroom, primary suite, closet

Target launch: End of May 2026. Inspections and disclosures expected by May 13.

Showing Schedule

WindowDetails
PrivateMay 12–16 by appointment
DL Open HouseTue May 12 | 11AM–1PM
After May 16No showings until public launch

The Opportunity

Court Drive is consistently one of the most sought-after streets in Pleasure Point — quiet, tree-lined, and just two blocks from The Hook. Properties here rarely come to market, and this one offers a single-level layout with legitimate indoor-outdoor entertaining space that is hard to find at this price point.

The private DL Exclusive window (May 12–16) gives you an opportunity to evaluate the property and potentially get under contract before public market exposure and competing offers. After the cosmetic updates are completed, the list price and competitive dynamics could shift.

Troy Hinds | 831.706.6224 | [email protected] | Collective Real Estate at David Lyng Real Estate

A section headline goes here

Follow Us On Instagram